Reading nonfiction presents unique challenges for students, as texts include photographs, charts, headings, bold print, captions, and indexes—elements that require skills beyond traditional fiction reading (RI.2.5–RI.5.5). Research shows that students comprehend and retain more information when they actively engage with the text, take notes, and make connections to prior knowledge (Graham & Perin, 2007). The RRC workbook guides students through this process, prompting them to record facts, reflect on ideas, and build connections across texts, themselves, and the world. By writing down key information, students strengthen comprehension, reinforce memory, and create a framework for future learning (Keene & Zimmermann, 1997).
Structured modeling is critical to student success. Fisher and Frey (2008) emphasize that students benefit from guided practice, where teachers demonstrate strategies such as Venn diagrams, compare-and-contrast activities, and mind maps before students work independently. These scaffolded approaches help students organize information visually or linearly, accommodating diverse learning styles and fostering independence. By moving from modeled lessons to small-group practice and independent application, students develop both confidence and critical thinking skills, while aligning with Common Core standards for reading and writing (RI.2.1–RI.5.8; W.2.2–W.5.2).
Studies consistently show that guided practice, reflection, and structured writing activities improve comprehension, retention, and student engagement (Duke & Pearson, 2001; Fisher & Frey, 2008). By integrating these strategies into nonfiction instruction, the workbook enables students to independently extract key ideas, synthesize information, and effectively communicate their understanding in writing.
References
Duke, Nell K., and P. David Pearson. “Effective Practices for Developing Reading Comprehension.” Journal of Education, vol. 189, no. 1/2, 2008, pp. 107–122.
Fisher, Douglas, and Nancy Frey. Better Learning Through Structured Teaching: A Framework for the Gradual Release of Responsibility. ASCD, 2008.
Graham, Steve, and Dolores Perin. Writing Next: Effective Strategies to Improve Writing of Adolescents in Middle and High Schools. Alliance for Excellent Education, 2007.
Keene, Ellin Oliver, and Susan Zimmermann. Mosaic of Thought: Teaching Comprehension in a Reader’s Workshop. Heinemann, 1997.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, and Council of Chief State School Officers. Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers, 2010. www.corestandards.org.
The Little Yellow Beehive aims to collect more astute studies that will come from our materials as we currently run pilots for struggling districts. This company seeks to collaborate with districts that share the same vision for implementing our curriculum to enhance students’ literacy performance.
Stay Connected With Us!